##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

MOHD HISHAM BIN MOHD ISA

Abstract

Introduction

Training basic life support (BLS) to school students would probably be the most cost-effective way to disseminate and propagate the knowledge and skills of CPR to the public. Hence this will increase the number of potential CPR providers thus increase the bystander rates. Little is known whether the different level of BLS trainers will effectively deliver the knowledge and technique of BLS to the school children.

Objective

For this reason, we would like to compare the teachers and the BLS providers as a trainer in the acquisition and retention of BLS knowledge and skills among secondary school students in Klang Valley, Malaysia.

Method

50 students were divided into two groups, teacher group, and BLS TST group. They were subjected to knowledge and psychomotor test at three stages; baseline, post-intervention, and retention at three months post-CPR training.

Result

Immediate post-training, students in teacher group showed a high increase in knowledge comparable to BLS TST group (median score difference 3 vs. 2, p >0.05) and psychomotor skill (median score difference 5 vs. 7, p <0.05). The level of knowledge and skills decreased slightly after three months but remained significantly higher than at baseline for both groups.

Conclusion

Majority of this young generation in Kuala Lumpur did not have an acceptable level of knowledge and skills on CPR. However, teachers can provide CPR training to their students as effective as medical students. The students not only acquired knowledge and psychomotor skills post training but able to retain them at three months. Therefore, CPR training should be recommended to all secondary school students in Malaysia.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

cardiopulmonary resuscitation, basic life support, school children

References
1. ECC Committee, Subcommittees, and Task Forces of the American Heart Association. 2005 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Circulation. 2005;112(suppl):IV-1-IV-203
2. Zheng ZJ,Croft JB, Giles WH, Mensah GA. Sudden cardiac death in the United Sates, 1989 to 1998. Circulation. 2001;104:2158-2163
3. Guidelines 2000 for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care: international consensus on science;2000.
4. Anderson ML, Cox M, Al-Khatib SM, Nichol G, Thomas KL, Chan PS, Saha-Chaundhuri P, Fosbol EL, Eigel B, Clendenen B, Peterson ED. Rates of cardiopulmonary resuscitation training in the United States. JAMA Intern Med.2014;174:194-201
5.Bobrow BJ, Spaite DW, Berg RA, et al. Chest compression-only CPR by lay rescuers and survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. JAMA 2010 Oct 6;304(13):1447-1454
6.James G. Jollis, Christopher B. Granger. Improving Care of Out-of-hHospital Cardiac Arrest. Next Steps. Circulation 2016;134:2040-2042
7.Cheskes L, Morrison L, Beaton D, et al. Are Canadians more willing to provide chest compression-only CPR? -A nation-wide public survey. C JEM 2016;18:253-263
8.B.K. Kanstad, S. A. Nilsen and K. Fredriksen. CPR knowledge and attitude to performing bystander CPR among secondary school students in Norway. Resuscitation 2011 Aug;82(8): 1053-1059
9.McNally B, Robb R, Mehta M, Vellano K, Valderrama AL, Yoon PW, Sasson C, Crouch A, Perez AB, Merritt R, Kellermann A. Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest surveillance-Cardiac arrest registry to enhance survival, United States, October 1, 2005-December 31, 2005.MMWR. 2011;60(SS08):1-19
10.B. Bogle, S. Mehrorta, G Chiampas, A.Z Aldeen. Assessment of knowledge and attitudes regarding automated external defibrillators and cardiopulmonary resuscitation among American University students. Emergency Medical Journal 2013;30:837-841
Section
EMAS Meeting 2018 Abtracts